
Latest photos
Local links...
- National Italian American Sports Hall of Fame
- Robert Morris University
- William H. Brown Elementary
- Chinese-American Museum of Chicago
- Andrew Jackson Language Academy
What we're reading...
- City College to combine nurse program
- West Loop shooting
- Police promise heat if gang don't...
- Cheap eduction
- new carp hearing
Latest comments
- Well done Laura. I have visited Smyth...
- Online business holds the greatest...
- So because you have frequented the...
- If income bracket and a threat to leave...
- Its a shame that they will expand a...
- Seriously? It's a huge corporate chain....
- I thought that the YWCA building had...
- Since Ms. Green does not send her...
- This is the most ridiculous thing I...
- Correction, Smyth School has the only...
No changes in host city contract for Chicago
06/22/2009 9:54 AM
Mayor Richard Daley has agreed to sign the standard International Olympic Committee host city contract should the IOC choose Chicago for its 2016 summer games. The move cements the role of taxpayers as backers of the games should budget projections for a Chicago Olympics fail to be realized.
The standard IOC contract puts the games' financial liability on the city and Chicago 2016, the local organizing committee. Chicago 2016 president Lori Healey, told the Tribune the city has a commitment for $500 million in insurance to pay for the sporting event, if needed.
Despite promises from the Mayor and Chicago 2016 officials that no public money would be spent on an Olympics here, the city, with aldermanic approval, has already put taxpayer dollars on the line to support the games, including a $500 million guarantee for the games' operations and $86 million to purchase the former Michael
Reese Hospital site for an Olympic Village.
Last year, Chicago Journal reported, for example, that John Murray, chief of bid operations for Chicago 2016, told members
of the Union League Club and visitors that "taxpayer money is not being
used for the games."
"The misconception out there about the games is they cost more than they bring in," Murray said.
Ticket revenues, sponsorship fees and television dollars would ensure the games profitability, he said.
Asked by reporters about funding after his Union
League address, Murray said he was referring to tax increment financing dollars
during his presentation, a program "the city has used, as you know, for
many years to facilitate development in areas, working with developers
to provide incentives - those funds, are funds generated by the
development itself, not using taxpayer dollars."
Near West and Near South Side aldermen worried about the implications of the mayor's overseas move, which was neither announced nor discussed with council members before he left, according to Ald. Robert Fioretti (2nd).
"My discussion with all my colleagues is what are we on the hook for? This diminishes support not only on the council but also among people who have high [hopes] for the Olympics here," Fioretti told Chicago Journal last Thursday morning.
Asked about the mayor's reversal, Ald. Walter Burnett (27th) said, "I think they changed some things."
It's a move, he acknowledged, that has left city council members frustrated. Burnett said he supported the games coming here but worried about the burden it might put on the city.
"I have a problem with that," he said.
The deal "needs transparency, review - it needs public discussion," Fioretti said.
Ald. Pat Dowell (3rd) wrote in an e-mail, "It would be unfortunate for the Mayor to commit Chicago taxpayers to
potential costs overrruns above and beyond the $500 million we are
already on the hook for. Perhaps, in the heat of the IOC meeting, he
spoke hastily.
"I don't think the Mayor can sign a contract,
substantially different from what is already on the books, on behalf of
the city without the approval of the city council. I am sure Mayor
Daley intends to bring this issue before the representatives of the
people of Chicago to discuss."
In an interview with WGN, Daley defended his decision.
"If everyone goes bankrupt in the world, I don't know what happens,"
Daley told the radio station. "The one thing I know is it is only $500 million to Chicago
taxpayers.
"Here is what it is. Only $500 million we agreed to. This other thing is like an insurance policy."
2 Comments - Add Your Comment
By Thomas Tresser from Lincoln Park
Posted: 06/26/2009 6:57 PM
I was one of the No Games Chicago delegates who went to Switzerland to take our 162-page "Book of Evidence" on why Chicago should NOT get the games. You will not believe the misinformation the 2016 Committee is feeding the IOC and the press - such as "there is no corruption in Chicago" ! They are saying that all corruption here began and ended with Gov Blaggo. Visit http://www.nogameschicago.com to sign our online petition.
By Lee from Lakeview
Posted: 06/22/2009 10:21 PM
If Daley's $500 million insurance policy is not good enough for the IOC, then why should Chicagoans trust that it's good enough for us?








