A love letter to my South Loop pals

I couldn't have survived this without you

02/03/2010 2:59 PM

By Bonnie McGrath

15 Comments - Add Your Comment


Photo by Lauren Bernhardt-Rhone



I stood around the South Loop School gym for an hour and a half after the polls closed last night. I had to give the judges of election my official candidate’s credentials so I could hang out and wait for the results that came rippling out of their computers on adding machine tape--from my own precinct and two others. I won all three precincts (and as it turned out later many others in the Second Ward), but I still smelled the possibility of doom because these were my neighbors voting for me. And I figured they like me--or at least recognize my name--and the odds were that I would be a solid favorite in the neighborhood.

And sure enough when I got home, I had lost the Cook County democratic primary for circuit court judge in the Hayes vacancy. And it was back to life as it used to be.

Or almost as it used to be. Because something changed during this campaign between me and my neighbors in the South Loop. I have learned through these past five months that I have some good friends here. True friends who would do just about anything for me. Not a single person I know from the South Loop has betrayed me, disappointed me or not been there for me during this whole silly season ordeal. No matter where I go in my neighborhood at Roosevelt and State--for blocks in every direction--there are people there who have my back, and as far as I know, the biggest best wishes for me in their hearts.

They put my signs in their windows--some in high rises so people in other high rises could see my name--and on their lawns, if they had them. And they dumped them in their trunks and brought them to their friends and relatives around the city and suburbs. They almost got hit by cars sticking them into snow packs along the side of the road, and they irritated the powers that be when they put them near early voting polling places around town.

They put my beautiful blue campaign cards on train and bus seats “by accident” and on top of newspapers in the boxes. They got my window signs in the neighborhood businesses when I was too timid to ask--or too short of time to bother. They introduced me to their friends in their own living rooms and had meet and greets at public venues where we had some fun.

They circulated petitions--and didn’t even get mad when they were subpoenaed by one of my overwrought and overbearing opponents who filed an election challenge to beat the band, accusing me not only of forging signatures, but everything else imaginable under the sun. (The case is still pending in the Illinois Supreme Court where he appealed after losing before the electoral board, the circuit court and the Illinois appellate court.) That little episode seemed to make my South Loop friends like me and support me even more.

They called, emailed and offered me a lot of breakfasts--from Yolk to Bongo Room to Starbucks at the Blackstone--so I could talk and vent, and they could collect more campaign literature to hand out to people who didn’t know me.

They sent emails to their friends and relatives begging them to vote for me because I was a decent person and someone who would make a fine judge. And even though I’m not supposed to know how much, I do know they gave me a ton of money--because they all came to my fundraiser at Petterino’s. They wanted me to have their money to pay for signs and ads and campaign literature (and mounting legal fees) so that I would be able to conduct a classy and well funded fight to the finish.

If I asked them to go around the neighborhood and recycle the left over signs, they would. If I needed their time or more money or a shoulder to boo-hoo on, I now know--after this run for judge--that they would be there. Even the ones who have moved for one reason or another to the suburbs (some even out of Cook County) have been there for me in so many different ways--and I know they would be again if I asked. They ignored the nasty and falsified comments about me on the blogs--and seemed to support me even more as the comments got nastier and meaner and bigger in falsehoods. (And they sure looked upset when I told a few of them that I lost their signatures during the records check part of my election challenge because they used an initial when they signed my petitions or some such variation. But who knew? And ultimately it mattered not-I had plenty of signatures to stay on the ballot.)

I have learned through the ups and downs of this campaign (one up was getting two beautiful banners made with my name and punch number to attach to my wrought iron fence in two directions; and a down was when one was ripped down by some unknown vandal) that I am loved and respected by a lot of people in the South Loop. And that is more valuable in many ways than winning an election with votes from people who don’t know you at all--and just have a mental picture of who you may be.

Now that it’s all over, I want every single one of my South Loop friends who helped me fight a massive old boys’ network in this campaign to know how much I appreciate every second--and every penny--they devoted to me in my quest to serve as a judge in Cook County. It was worth the full price of admission to this rarefied and weird and sometimes terrible world of Cook County politics. Because I also entered a world of being totally cared about by a host of pals who I know would do it all again. If I were to ask.



15 Comments - Add Your Comment




By Bonnie McGrath from South Loop
Posted: 03/25/2010 12:57 PM

i think it's time to end this mean-spirited and factually incorrect thread. let's put it to rest, ok? this sort of thing is NOT what this blog is for. NOTHING was forged. a notary made a mistake by notarizing a few signatures of people who were not in her presence. she knew many of these people and they indeed circulated the petitions and signed them. why two anonymous people are arguing about this on my blog i don't know. surely you both have other things to tend to in your own lives.



By factchecker from Printer's Row
Posted: 03/24/2010 9:08 AM

The comment was very clear -- the petitions she handled were invalidated because of the forged notary. Nowhere did I state she wasn't on the ballot. She stayed on the ballot because she was part of a slate of candidates and the slate had the requisite number of signatures even when her petitions were tossed out. But the larger point is both the Board of Elections and the Court of Appeals commented very negatively on her conduct. If you think her article did that situation justice so be it.



By Anonymous from McCook
Posted: 03/23/2010 11:15 AM

To continue, the comment of yours that I responded to specifically referred to an appellate opinion, not the decision that mentioned in your later posting. It does not speak well for your honesty and integrity that you would twist the facts to support your baseless arguments. The article that you criticize was written a month before that.



By Anonymous from McCook
Posted: 03/23/2010 11:10 AM

Way to stretch the truth, Factchecker. If the Election Board had "invalidated" the petitions, McGrath would not have appeared on the ballot. The fact that her name actually was on the ballot proves the falsity of your statement. Using your twisted logic, any candidate who presents a nominating petition that contains a single signature that has been canceled due to an objection must be removed from the ballot. That is not the law. Otherwise, all candidates would have to file "perfect" papers.



By FACTCHECKER from Printer's Row
Posted: 03/23/2010 10:26 AM

Uh, the column was after the Board of Elections had issued its opinion. The column made it sound as if they vindicated her from a foolish challenge. Instead they condemned her actions and invalidated her petitions because of the egregious violation of the notary requirement. She had to be aware of that opinion and their findings prior to posting her column.



By Anonymous from McCook
Posted: 03/22/2010 11:13 PM

Factchecker: Get over yourself. Did you bother to verify the date that the original column posted? How could the author comment on an opinion that was not issued until a month after the article was submitted. You seem like a bitter and vindicative person with some skeletons in your own closet.



By Fact Checker from printers row
Posted: 03/21/2010 6:06 PM

No comment on the appellate court opinion on your challenge? Oscar parties more important? While the Board of Elections did allow you to stay on the ballot, it is hardly good journalism to cover up their finding that a judicial candidate (and lawyer) had willfully violated the petition requirements, essentially forging notarization. The Court of Appeals found the behavior especuially reprehensible for a judicial candidate. I guess another case of not reporting all the facts.



By Marlyn from Bronzeville
Posted: 02/23/2010 1:42 AM

Had I been in Chicago around this time I would have voted and supported one of the good guys - you Bonnie!



By here4ever from south loop
Posted: 02/10/2010 8:21 PM

P.N. is 100% correct. Al Capone started the ward organizations, aka political machine? Whoever said that knows nothing about Chicago history. Anton Cermak consolidated them city wide and is widely credited with creating the Democratic Machine citywide, which, incidently, has less power than ever thanks to a Mr. Shakman.



By P.N. from South Loop
Posted: 02/08/2010 5:35 PM

Someone should have fact-checked Paul from Wrigleyville. Political machines were around long before Al Capone. They started with Michael Cassius McDonald, a saloon owner, and were consolidated under Mayor Richard J. Daley.



By homeless harry from below wacker drive
Posted: 02/05/2010 10:55 PM

"were a decent person," Bonnie? cmon! you're a wonderfully honest and fantastic human being! i'm sorry that you lost, but hey, there's always next time!



By South Loop Joe from Dearborn Park
Posted: 02/04/2010 4:53 PM

FactChecker Thanks for checking and as it has been my personal experience and the reason I did not vote for Bonnie McGrath is that She does not always report the facts correctly. Fine for a soapbox column in this paper but not for an Elected Official. Not even in Chicago.



By susan fredriksen from N.C. mts., x-S. looper
Posted: 02/04/2010 2:43 PM

Bonnie, as I told you, I tried to convert the mountain snowflakes here into votes for you, but I guess there just wasn't quite enough snow. If there had been just 1 more inch...... Susan, always your south loop friend in spite of living now as a mountain girl.



By FactChecker from Printer's Row
Posted: 02/04/2010 10:26 AM

According to the City Board of Elections site you lost one of the three precincts at the school (perhaps the difference is when early votes were included as opposed to the tally run at the precinct) won one by one vote and the third by 5 votes. Do you think the not recommended rating by the leading bar groups was the difference? As the only woman in a three candidate race your chances had to be very favorable going in.



By Paul from Wrigleyville I
Posted: 02/03/2010 6:21 PM

You gave them a hell of a fight that they didn't expect, but you got their respect. The whole thing highlights how we need to work for a way to break the power of the political machine established by Al Capone. (Also a South Loop guy, to give him his due.)